Reviews
Anonymous
Telekale is a monster! The scientific reliability of diagnosing mental patients is very questionable. The ability to reliably predict the danger is even more doubtful. It is possible to realize an aggressive attack on scientific grounds by a mental expert on these elements. They can also attack psychiatrists as they reach their opinions. For example, what were the criteria for determining the risk? What tasks are I authorized to set criteria? Risk? In the diagnosis of mental illness, if a psychiatrist determines that a person suffering from mental illness has mental illness, and if it determines that the person does not agree, then the person lacks "insight" and provides evidence of mental illness. Catch 22. Sadly, many Americans who have never experienced this process are obviously shocking, but it is not surprising to those involved. The protection of those diagnosed as psychosis is an illusion, and the lawsuit is a fake. This effect is eloquently expressed by Prof. Palin:
The toxin affects all participants in the judicial system, creates syncysticism, creates an insult to the law, damages participants, reinforces a poor trial, and sometimes makes excessive and vicious testimony. This reality is well known to those who frequently use the local justice service. Representatives of persons with physical or mental disabilities, prosecutors, state lawyers, full-time judges, experts, lay people, defendants, and particularly important points are "mental health professionals" or so-called social welfare professionals who use the legal power of persons with physical or physical disabilities. (Court order) Force people to submit to undesired unjust psychotherapy. How Recognizing the "application of the law," Harris' constitutional right to ignore the law is being done in the name of "knowing what is right." ignore the law It is not my purpose to show that this claim (knowing what is right) is scientifically invalid. There is a growing rebellion among the nationalist psychiatrists about the incriminating habits of psychiatry. Here, I think it is good to look very skeptical at the validity of the process that relies on lies to get results.
